SIOE England

Racism is the lowest form of stupidity! Islamophobia is the height of common sense!


  • Photobucket
    Join the resistance

    SIOE - Fighting KUFFARPHOBIA

    (Kuffarphobia - the irrational fear and loathing of all non-Muslims)

    Photobucket


    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

    DEMOCRACY NOT THEOCRACY!

    NO SHARIA HERE!


    ______________________ PRESS CONTACTS ______________________
    Anders Gravers
    Tel: +45 9677 1784
    mail: sioe@siad.dk
    Stephen Gash
    Tel: +44 122 854 7317
    mail: sioe.nsh@btinternet.com


  • SIOE membership and donation

    IBAN: DK 91 9860 8890006605
    Swift kode: FIONDK 22


  • Photobucket

    ______________________ SIOE SUPPORTS ______________________

    Greenlanders

    groenlandsflag

    against ethnic cleansing


    supportserbiankosovologo.jpg


    supportisrael.jpg


    ______________________

    SUPPORT
    Photobucket
    ASSYRIANS
    ______________________
    SUPPORT
    Photobucket
    COPTS
    ______________________
    SUPPORT
    Photobucket
    WEST PAPUA
    ______________________

    Photobucket
    ______________________

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


    //sioesverige.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/sioefull.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • PRESS RELEASE APPLICATION FOR A COURT INJUNCTION AGAINST CAMBRIDGE MILL ROAD MOSQUE

    Posted by sioeengland on January 13, 2014

    PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    APPLICATION FOR A PROHIBITORY COURT INJUNCTION TO BE SERVED AGAINST THE MUSLIM ACADEMIC TRUST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A MEGA-MOSQUE, ISLAMIC TEACHING FACILITY WITH MUSLIM DWELLINGS IN MILL ROAD, CAMBRIDGE

    The application is to be heard in Cambridge County Court at 10.00am on 17th January 2014 by His Honour the District Judge Underwood.

    The application was madeby Miss Sareeta Webra and who is being assisted by Stephen Gash.
    When requested, copies of documents will be forwarded as attachments to emails as pdf documents. Such documents include detailed reasoning and examples which are summarised below.
    The application has been made broadly for the following reasons:-
    1. Gathering of public voting data on the Mill Road Mosque construction has not been conducted lawfully, if at all.

    2. A significant number of complaints have been forwarded to Cambridge County Council about the mosque’s construction. It would appear comments in support of the mosque have been replicated to make it seem as if support outweighs objection.

    3. It is well documented that many so-called Muslim charities are fronts for Islamic terrorism and that several of those cited are based in the United Kingdom.

    Therefore, mosque construction must be halted until Prime Minister David Cameron’s proposed legalisation of sharia-based finance in the UK, including the first sharia finance bond outside of a Muslim country, is investigated by police, the National Audit Office, Financial Ombudsman, the Financial Conduct Authority and any other authority responsible for preventing money laundering and the financing of terrorism

    4. Islamic practices contravene numerous sections of the Sex Discrimination Act 2010 and such discrimination is openly preached and practised in mosques.

    Claimant Sareeta Webra founder of Sikhs Against Sharia (SAS) said, “As a first generation English Sikh I am alarmed at how Islamic discrimination against non-Muslims is defended, condoned and even encouraged, by the British establishment. Sikhism was founded in 1469 specifically to combat violent Muslim oppression and persecution of non-Muslims in the Indian Subcontinent. The bravery of those Sikh founders has been punished with the partition of the Sikh homeland in India. Now it seems the British establishment is sowing the seeds of sharia in England. As a consequence the thistles of social division will spring up and choke the flowers of freedom my parents came to England to savour”.

    In over 1000 years of Islamic invasions of India the concept of “Moderate Muslim” was never created because it simply is not true. Islam dictates its followers to put their religion before the defence of the realm within which it resides. That is a fact. If anything, they are better described a “Sharia Muslims” because that is indeed, their PRESCRIPTIVE religion’s true title, and the only one of this type remaining in the world today.”

    “David Cameron’s Sukuk Dream Team has seriously overlooked the fact that there are absolutely no provisions for Sharia-Law based fiat-financial instruments found in any legislation or statute. A remarkable move by a desperate cabinet grappling to hide the proceeds of Saudi-Oil Barons’ baksheesh barter; by making the entire general public guilty of the same financial crime?
    Moreover, England is a COMMON LAW JURISDICTION where EQUALITY is mandatory, and therefore even if such ridiculous separatist financial products were granted; they would only be allowed if they were available to EVERYONE, including NON-MUSLIMS i.e. Sikhs, Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Atheists, Agnostics, Jedi, etc.

    Sharia finance doesn’t just mean interest-free loans. Muslims say it is decreed by allah and it will be Muslim clerics deciding how the money is distributed. We wouldn’t let Christian vicars decide who gets a loan and who doesn’t, so we should not let Muslim clerics discriminate against non-Muslims, as they surely will.”

    Stephen Gash, co-founder of top Islamisation Of Europe (SIOE) said, “Obviously, checks and balances are not currently in place to ensure that Muslim charities based in England, in particular, are not siphoning cash to fund terror. Sharia finance does not outlaw the funding of Islamic paramilitary action through compulsory zakat. Indeed, it is clearly mandated in the Koran that Muslims must make war on the infidel who dwell around them (Sura 9:123).

    We have recently seen the fruits of Islamic teachings with the muder of Lee Rigby. Those found guilty clearly explained their actions were motivated by Islamic teachings, only for David Cameron to skip out like “Buttons” in a pantomime and say ‘Oh no it isn’t.’ “

    Sareeta Webra explained “Elephants are a sacred animal in India, so it pains me to say this, but until British politicians stop skirting around the elephant in the room, namely sharia and Islamic teachings in general, then we can never have a grown-up debate about the place, if any, of Islam in English society. Mosques across the Islamic world teach Muslims that they are superior in every way to non-Muslims. Parliamentarians need to accept that all Islamic teachings are sharia law based, which flagrantly oppose Human Rights legislation confirmed in both EU and English law, so no more mosques must be built in England until English law is made superior to sharia law with all its inherent discrimination.

    Sharia Law must be eradicated in its entirety. Anyone wishing to eat meat, marry, work, reproduce etc must do so like the rest of us under the law of their respective country. The Scottish for instance, live under English Law in England, and are not subject to Scottish Law. The same is compulsory for all Muslims. No alien religious laws must be allowed in England.”

    Stephen Gash continued, “No Muslim country is signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but each has signed the Cairo Declaration that enshrines sharia law, that in turn ensures the dominance of Muslims over the ‘kuffar.’ This is intolerant attitude is evidenty being taught in mosques in England.

    Islam is a problem for Muslims to solve and because they wilfully refuse to solve their problem, Muslims have made themselves a problem for everybody else.”“

    Sareeta Webra said, “The English Reformation and foundation of the Church of England started in Cambridge and is celebrated with a plaque on King’s College. Cambridge is the last bastion of Christianity in England and must not fall to Islam, which the construction of the Mill Road mosque clearly intends for Cambridge. I am myself a believer in Jesus Christ the Saviour and have become so without in any way abandoning my Sikhism and love for the Khalsa. Cambridge University has immense respect across the world as an academic institution which is why Cambridge has been targeted as the location for what can only be described as a symbol of Islamic dominance.”

    Stephen Gash said, “Cambridge must not become a hub for funding international terrorism by having a triumphalist mosque dumped within it.

    Fine words are not enough.

    Proper financial accounting must be employed within existing mosques before any more mosques are built in England, including the proposed Mill Road Mosque.”

    Sareeta Webra concluded,

    “Children born in England, a country renowned for its fairness and equality, ought to be brought up solely subject to English Laws. We must not allow this to be jeopardised by a doctrine that promotes hatred for fellow humans under the guise of a religion. As practicing Sikhs, Hindus & Buddhists originating from India we are not allowed to ignore the law of this land or try to supersede it!

    Ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law, something that the proper constabularies of yesteryear enforced very well.”

    Some sources for background notes served with the application.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_charities_accused_of_ties_to_terrorism
    http://www.shariahfinancewatch.org/blog/category/zakat/
    http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3792/islamic-relief-worldwide-terrorism
    http://www.ipcs.org/article/terrorism/charitable-organization-and-terrorist-funding-the-case-of-muslim-aid-2423.html
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/practices/zakat.shtml
    http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/apr/24/top-1000-charities-donations-britain
    http://www.cambridgemosqueproject.org/2013/06/13/creating-spaces-of-hope/

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

    The Sinister Case of Sareeta Webra

    Posted by sioeengland on July 31, 2013

    ImageStephen Gash takes full responsibility for the following article “The Sinister Case of Sareeta Webra” which is based on conversations between Stephen and Sareeta and dozens of documents concerning her claim that Sareeta showed to Stephen.

    This is only a fraction of what actually occurred.

    Perhaps Sikhs reading this article might consider taking their financial and insurance business elsewhere and telling fellow Sikhs about how the British legal system has treated a Sikh woman in such a cavalier fashion.

    The Sinister Case of Sareeta Webra

    The Incident

    Sareeta is a thirty nine year old English Sikh woman who just one week before her twenty seventh birthday was mown down in London by a car, in what authorities described as a hit and run.  Indeed, authorities initially considered whether to treat it as a case of attempted murder. Some still believe it was attempted murder. The impact propelled Sareeta some sixty feet along the road and several feet into the air, causing her to sustain severe injuries including broken bones and lacerations.  Even more seriously, Sareeta suffered a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury which has permanently affected her life and for which she is now forced to claim disability benefits.

    Although the car was not registered to the driver at the time, a valid insurance policy still covered the vehicle concerned.  This was ascertained by the Motor Insurance Bureau who stated that the company providing cover was Barclays Insurance. Sareeta herself had no life insurance and held no drivers licence which placed her in a special category as a pedestrian, for insurance purposes.

    The Politics and Discriminatory Sharia Finance

    It is historical fact that Sikhism was started to combat Muslim aggression in India. Consequently, Muslim countries have little love for Sikhs.

    http://www.realsikhism.com/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1218559922&ucat=7

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_Sikhism

    It is both Sareeta’s and my belief, that the apparent hostility shown by Barclays insurance against her is less to do with Barclays representing its clients and more to do with her being a Sikh.

    Sareeta actively pursues her intention to remove the 1947 Partition of India which created the Muslim state of Pakistan and split the Sikhs’ homeland, the Punjab, placing most of it in Pakistan.

    http://www.gopetition.co.uk/petitions/abolition-of-the-1947-partition-of-punjab.html

    This was done with much bloodshed and displacement of people and has left a lasting legacy of hostility between Pakistani Muslims and Sikhs. Naturally, the world’s Muslims side with their Brotherhood in Pakistan.

    Barclays has received substantial financial backing from Middle Eastern Muslim countries, not least Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Not only is Saudi Arabia a Muslim country, it is the centre of world Islam and contains Islam’s holiest site. Saudi Arabia is one of the UK’s largest recipients of weapons including a significant number of fighter jets. Some arms sales in the past have reportedly involved bribes, but investigations were closed down by Blair’s government under the guise of national security.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jun/07/bae1

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6180945.stm

    Unfortunately, the Barclays connections with Saudi Arabia and Qatar have allegedly resulted in dodgy financial events, arguably bordering on corruption that required official investigations.

    http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/12/news/companies/barclays-saudi-justice-investigation/index.html

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9841197/Barclays-investigated-over-claims-it-lent-Qatar-money-to-invest-in-itself.html

    It seems that the British establishment has prostituted the United Kingdom’s economy to oil sheikhdoms. Its once proud financial services industry, that the UK’s economy now depends upon, is in tatters. Even London’s historic stock exchange is largely owned by Middle Eastern potentates.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2113159/Qatar-bought-Britain-They-Shard-They-Olympic-Village-And-dont-care-Lamborghinis-clamped-shop-Harrods.html

    Firstly as Chancellor of the Exchequer, then as Prime Minister, Gordon Brown stated he intended for the UK to be a world centre of sharia financing.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1141087/Britains-world-leader-sharia-banking–havent-grasped-sinister-dangerous-implications.html

    Anybody who knows even a smidgeon about sharia understands that it is profoundly discriminatory against non-Muslims. This is especially so concerning Sikhs who are not even “people of the book,” as are Christians and Jews who, in theory, are offered a modicum of protection from Muslim aggression, which however, rarely manifests itself in practice. So, Sikhs are considered to be of even lowlier status than Jews and Christians by holier-than-thou Muslims.

    As far back as 2007 it was being reported that Barclays was moving aggressively into sharia financial services.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ax47JhwC1NRI

    This submission to Islamic practises has since increased exponentially.

    It is a sure thing that Sikhs and Jews will come off worst where sharia finance holds sway.

    This is probably, if not assuredly, the case with Sareeta who proudly runs her Facebook Blog

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/sikhraj/

    The solicitor

    It was some time before Sareeta’s case first appeared in a court room, during which time she convalesced and literally got herself back on her feet. Her original litigation specialist, Stephen Thorpe, handled her case so well that Barclays Insurance admitted “full and complete commercial liability”, so one would assume that it was an open and shut case. Indeed, this has been stated several times to Sareeta by lawyers. However, even after nearly thirteen years her case has not yet been resolved.

    This is in large part due to Stephen Thorpe being replaced by a solicitor within the same firm, named Marc Folgate, who essentially sat on proceedings and effectively stopped progress. When Sareeta started a complaint against her solicitor, the firm concerned promised to resurrect her case if she dropped her complaint. She duly dropped her complaint only to be told in not so many words “to go away”. This would be an appalling way for a solicitor to behave towards any client, but to dupe a brain-injured and vulnerable woman, who absolutely needed somebody to act on her behalf, is contemptible.

    The legal firm concerned was Scrivenger Seabrook, Vernon House, 26 New Street, St Neots, Cambridgeshire, PE19 1XB

    http://www.sslaw.co.uk/

    Things had really looked promising in 2009 when court proceedings began in earnest after Sareeta appointed a barrister specialising in incidents resulting in brain injuries. At a meeting with her legal advocates it was agreed that Sareeta would pursue her claim through the courts who would determine the level of any damages to be awarded to her.

    Unfortunately, things took a downturn when Sareeta was informed that she would have to meet her own costs privately because Barclays Insurance stated it would only meet the costs of the defendants, using a legal mechanism known as Article 75. As she was uninsured, Sareeta was unable to call upon an insurance company to fight her side and meet her costs.

    So, unless she won her claim, and was also awarded costs, Sareeta would have to meet her own legal expenses. Otherwise payments would be made out of her compensation or out of her own pocket.

    When this stark reality slapped Marc Folgate in the face, he claimed that he would have to look after his company’s economics and effectively sat on the case. He never completed the instructions given by her very experienced and competent barrister. A judge stated to Sareeta that her solicitor had done no work since 1996.

    The “Hypnotherapist”

    Worse still, Sareeta says Folgate ordered her to see a “hypnotherapist” unchaperoned at a private residential address and refused to provide a CV for the “therapist” concerned. To a lay person, this might appear an extraordinary way for a solicitor to behave; to place an already vulnerable woman in an even more vulnerable situation.  Due to her brain injury, that at times made it difficult for her to cope with proceedings, Sareeta appointed two litigation friends who also acted as lawful advocates to assist her in her dealings with lawyers. Her solicitor refused point blank to allow an advocate to accompany her in visiting the “therapist” and also his office. He did, however, insist that a “student” sit in at a meeting between himself and Sareeta, despite Sareeta’s objections.

    The Lien

    Naturally, Sareeta attempted to instruct other solicitors, one even agreeing to pay the £16,000 disbursements for release of the case files from the inactive Folgate. However, the lien placed on the files was increased substantially to around £30,000, and Sareeta maintains that it was increased even further to around £50,000. It begs the question what does this particular solicitor have to hide from others in his profession? Would his inertia be construed as incompetence, negligence or something else?

    Sareeta says that her inactive solicitor told her by phone that he would make sure no other solicitor would take her case.

    It is extraordinary that someone concerned about the economy of his firm would turn down money offered by other lawyers to take over the case. It begs a further question, was money provided by other sources? The god of money moves in mysterious ways.

    The levels of costs may have frightened off all other solicitors Sareeta has approached to represent her, but actual reasons are not forthcoming which increases the stress Sareeta endures.  Although at least one set of lawyers said her case was “too dangerous” for them to act on her instructions.

    We both suspect that this is due to her status within the Sikh community.

    Also, it is well known that Islam condones paedophilia and it is likely that the sinister happenings surrounding Sareeta’s case stem from her involvement in assisting someone in exposing an alleged paedophile within Barclays at senior board level.

    So far she has approached over one hundred lawyers and in desperation even asked Cherie Blair and the Archbishop of York for help, both of whom bluntly declined.

    The last lawyers Sareeta asked to represent her, earlier this year, provided the familiar scenario of “an open and shut case,” but then declaring they could not represent her. However, these genuinely kind gentlemen suggested that her only recourse is to go directly to the Royal Courts of Justice.

    £300,000 is the figure Sareeta’s barrister suggested her case was worth, based on his considerable and successful experience. This figure was arrived at before a second round of medical reports concerning the detrimental effects of the injury on Sareeta having a family of her own and also loss of earnings were taken into consideration. These would make any compensation considerably higher, possibly running into the millions.

    As Barclays is an international corporation, it may be possible to persuade competent lawyers in America to act on Sareeta’s behalf. Sadly, some quarters of the British justice system appear to be becoming as worryingly corrupt as British financial services have seemingly become, but there are still good honest lawyers within it, fortunately. We just hope one has the courage to confront the dangers referred to, which make Sareeta’s case so sinister.

     

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

    The Trinity of Evil

    Posted by sioeengland on May 16, 2010

    Diversity – Political Correctness – Multiculturalism

    This poison has been used to mitigate the punishment of murderers, rapists, and drug dealers who have enjoyed its all embracing protection.

    While every one of us should be outraged that criminals have been given a charter to freely offend, it presents an even greater danger to our way of life. All over the Western world this trinity of evil is easing our country’s slide into abject servitude to Islam.

    Although Britain’s Labour party finally admitted that it used mass immigration to socially engineer this country for cynically political advantage, it failed to face up to, or perhaps does not even care that this mass immigration has also like a Trojan Horse bought a violent and dangerous enemy into our midst.

    Despite evidence increasing day by day clearly showing that Islam plans to take control of Britain, and as is true to form the world over Muslims work at this through intimidation and violence, even so our political masters continue to allow outrageous behaviour by Muslim gangs to go unpunished.

    http://www.eutimes.net/2009/06/labour-partys-mp-shahid-malik-predicts-more-likely-he-wants-total-islamification-of-britain/

    Labour Party MP Shahid Malik has predicted the total Islamification of Britain and a Muslim prime minister, “Allah willing”, within the next thirty years.

    “There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe, without swords, without guns, without conquests. The 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within the next few decades.”
    Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi

    Muslim gangs know that through Diversity, PC, and Multiculturalism they are untouchable.

    http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/siteinfo/newsround/pcplod2.html
    STRATHCLYDE’S PC-POLICE AFRAID OF ASIAN GANGS, SUGGESTS MP

    Many of the Mosques have been shown to be little more than vehicles for the indoctrination of Muslims into a global jihad, and these Muslims either express their loyalty to the cause by fighting in wars against us in Afghanistan, and Iraq, or on our streets. Everyone who is not a Muslim is the enemy, and the enemy must be confronted.

    http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=10;t=004928;p=1

    TERROR chiefs plan to flood our streets with heroin in a terrifying plot to wage “chemical jihad” on Britain.
    And they have been using hate-filled Muslim gangs as their UK dealers.
    How PC protects hate filled Muslims is no better exemplified than through a recent event involving the desecration of one of our countries war memorials.

    Conservative MP David Burrows said this.

    “We in this country owe a colossal debt to the war dead and so their memories should be treated with the proper respect. Criminals who desecrate war memorials must be properly punished not let off with a slap on the wrist.”
    http://davidburrowes.com/10112009_one_war_memorial_desecrated_every_week

    However when a Muslim is involved in one of the most blatant forms of this hate crime, then that punishment is mollified.

    “A Muslim protester who daubed a war memorial with graffiti glorifying Osama Bin Laden and proclaiming ‘Islam will dominate the world’ walked free from court after prosecutors ruled his actions were not motivated by religion”.
    Tohseef Shah, 21, could have faced a tougher sentence if the court had accepted that the insults – which included a threat to kill the Prime Minister – were inspired by religious hatred.
    http://www.ukpoliceonline.co.uk/index.php?/topic/41813-muslim-daubs-war-memorial-with-islam-will-dominate-the-world/
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7657600/Muslim-walks-free-as-court-told-Osama-bin-Laden-graffiti-not-religiously-motivated.html

    One of Britain’s leading Bishops warned back in 2008 of the danger of Muslims creating in Britain no go areas for non Muslims.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1574694/Bishop-warns-of-no-go-zones-for-non-Muslims.html
    By Jonathan Wynne-Jones
    Published: 12:01AM GMT 06 Jan 2008

    The Rt Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester and the Church’s only Asian bishop, says that people of a different race or faith face physical attack if they live or work in communities dominated by a strict Muslim ideology.

    Look though what our political masters said.
    William Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, said “the bishop had “probably put it too strongly”.

    Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said “the idea of no-go areas was “a gross caricature of reality”.
    The Muslim Council of Britain today described his comments as “frantic scaremongering”,

    http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/4132776-no-go-areas-for-white-people-in-england
    No Go areas for white people in England.

    Pakistani gangs have turned Derby’s historic Arboretum Park into a no-go zone for non-Muslims.
    There have been at least seven violent incidents in the park, which has the distinction of being Britain’s first public park, dating back to 1840. The majority of victims have been from the local white community, although one black and one Sikh have also been attacked.

    http://theopinionator.typepad.com/my_weblog/muslim_crime/
    Muslim thug who spat on WWII Hero’s Medals Escapes Jail
    NO suprise that we have another sickening blatant example of the British judiciary system going soft on muslim thugs.  Iraqi, Serwan Abdullah, 23, another muslim-sorry-excuse-for-a-man spat on a World War II hero’s medals, worn by his proud grandson, on Remembrance Day. After committing the abhorrent and unprovoked act – the cowardly Abdullah quickly ran away.

    Police release details of hate-crime attacker : [However the Greater Manchester Police refused to class the crime as racially motivated.]
    Reporter: Richard Hooton
    Date online: 26/02/2010
    POLICE have released a description of one of the attackers involved in a vicious assault in Westwood — and have appealed for information.

    The Chronicle revealed on Monday that four white teenagers were attacked by a group of seven Asian males, aged in their late teens, in Featherstall Road North.

    The victims told the Chronicle they feared the incident on Wednesday, February 17, was racially-motivated.

    The GMP press office twice told the Chronicle that it did not believe there was a racial element and had classed the crime as common assault.
    http://www.oldham-chronicle.co.uk/news-features/8/news-headlines/37426/police-release-details-of-hatecrime-attacker

    There gangs roam or streets with impunity knowing that the establishment will cave into their demands, they threaten violence and mob rampage to get concessions and the establishment concedes to their demands.

    And finally, start this hatred young just so they will be nice obedient drones for the coming fight. Enjoy.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/4700709/We-must-stop-Muslim-schools-teaching-that-integration-is-a-sin.html

    We must stop Muslim schools teaching that integration is a sin
    Some Muslim schools make it their mission to prevent assimiliation – and it is time the Government changed that, says Denis MacEoin.

    Many commentators have spoken of the long-term consequences to society of an over-lenient policy of multiculturalism. In the Islamic case, the growth of exclusive communities in major cities carries the added risk that young men and women may be more easily lured into violence. ….Speaking at a Muslim Educational conference in 2002, Dr Musharraf Hussain stated that: “The raison d’être of Muslim schools is vigorously stated by its founders as follows: to prevent the assimilation of the new generation.”

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/feb/06/books.education
    A Saudi-run school in London uses textbooks which describe Jews as monkeys and Christians as pigs.

    History has shown that appeasement only emboldens the bully and fuels greater demands.

    “The appeaser feeds the crocodile in the hope that it will eat him last” – Winston Churchill

    Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments »

    Press release – note date change: Pamela Geller: SIOA Rally Calls For Halt to Plans for Ground Zero Mosque

    Posted by sioeengland on May 10, 2010

    The human rights group Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) is hosting a rally at Ground Zero to protest the construction of a mosque at the site of the Islamic terror attack that brought down the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. Victims of 9/11 – those who lost family or friends, or who were injured on that day – are especially invited to attend.

    The SIOA No 9/11 Mosque Rally will be at Ground Zero on June 6 at 12 noon. Supporting groups (partial list): ACT for America, Manhattan; Z Street; Freedom Defense Initiative; Faith Freedom International, Stuart Kaufman, VAST, No Mosque at Ground Zero.

    The rally was scheduled after the Community Board for New York City’s financial district unanimously approved the construction of a 13-story mosque and Islamic cultural center right across from Ground Zero.

    SIOA executive director Pamela Geller commented: “What could be more insulting and humiliating than a monster mosque in the shadow of the World Trade Center buildings that were brought down by an Islamic jihad attack? Any decent American, Muslim or otherwise, wouldn’t dream of such an insult. It’s a stab in eye of America.”

    “We chose June 6 as the rally date,” Geller explained, “because it’s D-Day. In 1944, Americans acted against the evil of Nazism. Now it is time for Americans to stand up against the evil of Islamic jihad terrorism and Islamic supremacism.”

    Speakers at the No 9/11 Mosque will include Nonie Darwish, ex-Muslim and author of Now They Call Me Infidel; Simon Deng, the Sudanese ex-slave and campaigner for human rights for Sudanese Christians; James Lafferty of the Virginia Anti-Shariah Task Force; and Anders Gravers of Stop Islamisation of Europe (SIOE). Hosting the event are Geller, the popular blogger and columnist who publishes the acclaimed AtlasShrugs.com blog, and SIOA associate director Robert Spencer, the bestselling author and director of JihadWatch.org. Geller is the author (with Spencer) of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America (Foreword by Ambassador John Bolton), coming July 27 from Simon & Schuster.

    As a manifestation of Islamic domination and expansionism, mosques have frequently been placed on the sites of the holy places of other religions. The Al-Aqsa Mosque, built on top of the Temple of the Jews in Jerusalem, is the most famous example. Many famous churches have been turned into mosques, including the Aya Sofya Mosque in Istanbul, which until the Islamic conquest of Constantinople of 1453 was the grandest church in Christendom. The Umayyad Mosque in Damascus was, before the Islamic conquest, the Church of St. John the Baptist. Historian Sita Ram Goel has estimated that over two thousand mosques in India were built on the sites of Hindu temples.

    Said Geller: “The only Muslim center that should be built in the shadow of the World Trade Center is one that is devoted to expunging the Koran and all Islamic teachings of the violent jihad that they prescribe, as well as all hateful texts and incitement to violence.”

    Rally speakers and participants will stand with those lost loved ones on 9/11, and call for an end to plans for this mosque that insults the memory of those who died on that day.

    SIOA is one of America’s foremost organizations defending human rights, religious liberty, and the freedom of speech against Islamic supremacist intimidation and attempts to bring elements of Sharia to the United States.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

    “In England, A Victory for Freedom”

    Posted by sioeengland on May 10, 2010

    The plan of a monster mosque in Dudley has now been scrapped thanks to a brave EDL protest.

    Read Pamela Gellers article “In England, A Victory for Freedom” in American Thinker

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

    Harrow stop mosque building demo 13th December

    Posted by sioeengland on October 8, 2009

    skul-mosque_bayonet

    The Prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan, publicly read an Islamic poem including the lines: “The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and Muslims our soldiers…”

    HAMMER THEIR HELMETS! BLUNT THEIR BAYONETS! (metaphorical reference to no more mosques).

    NO MORE MOSQUE BUILDING DEMONSTRATION

    Location:  Square in front of Harrow Civic Centre, Station Road/Milton Road junction.

    Date:          13th December 2009

    Time:         14.00 – 16.00 (2pm – 4pm)

    APPROVED FOR PROTEST

    1. Approved anti-sharia and anti-Islamisation chants, banners and placards will be permitted. Official chants:-

    No sharia here text2 

    Hammer their helmets! Blunt their bayonets! (this is a metaphorical reference to no more mosques).

    No more mosques!

    Stop kuffarphobia!

    2. English, Welsh, Scottish, N. Irish, national flags, national flags of other countries, certain other national flags will be permitted and encouraged. Some flags already known to be represented are:-

    Bulgaria

    Denmark

    Serbia Israel

    Let us know which flag you’ll be flying!

    3. Certain other flags representing communities struggling against Islamic colonisation such as Papua New Guinea and Biafra will be permitted.

    4. Certain civil rights flags, banners and placards will be encouraged provided they are displayed within the no-sharia context of the demonstration.

    5. ALL MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ORGANISERS BEFORE THE PROTEST Speakers using hand held megaphones will address the gathering. Names of speakers will be provided to the police prior to the demonstration. Speeches must be approved by the organisers.

    WANTED

    Speakers to explain Muslim persecution in Islamic countries.

    Copts in Egypt

    Hindus in Bangladesh

    Hindus in Malayasia

    Christians in Indonesia

    Christians in Pakistan

    Papuans in Indonesia

    Jews everywhere

    BANNED FROM PROTEST

    1. As with previous SIOE demonstrations, political parties are banned.

    2. Any racist chanting, banners and placards will result in immediate ejection of the perpetrators from the demo as will nazi salutes.

    3. Totalitarian symbols such as nazi swastikas, communist hammer and sickles, Islamic star and crescent, UNLESS CLEARLY CROSSED OUT OR DEFACED WITH A STOP SIGN.

    Banners, placards and speeches will be shown to the police prior to the protest starting if requested.

    Map

    The pointer “C” is the junction of Milton Road, Station Road opposite Rosslyn Crescent View Larger Map

    Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments »

    Wave of Homophobia Sweeps the Muslim World

    Posted by sioeengland on September 18, 2009

    So blame the British

    European Prudery Exported to the Colonies

    The story of Lot and related verses in the Koran were not interpreted as unambiguous references to homosexual sex until the 20th century, says Everett Rowson, professor of Islamic Studies at New York University. This reinterpretation was the result of Western influences — its source was the prudery of European colonialists who introduced their conception of sexual morality to the newly conquered countries.

    The fact of the matter is that half of the laws across the world that prohibit homosexuality today are derived from a single law that the British enacted in India in 1860. “Many attitudes with regard to sexual morality that are thought to be identical to Islam owe a lot more to Queen Victoria than to the Koran,” Rowson says.

    More than anything, it is the politicization of Islam that has led to the persecution of gays today. Sexual morals are no longer a private matter. They are regulated and instrumentalized by governments.

    Flytheflag2

    Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »

    Conversion (desecration) of a church into a mosque

    Posted by sioeengland on September 16, 2009

    SIOE wants the names of the destruction companies destroying England’s heritage and replacing it with the inferior stoning-age islam, either by this act of wanton vandalism or by the building of the houses of hate called mosques.

    These companies must be named, shamed and boycotted.

    SIOE wants the names of the councillors who permitted this sacrilege. Our colleagues in Denmark have compiled a list of those councillors who granted permission for the building of a gigantic mosque in Copenhagen. These councillors have experienced the wrath of Danish people.

    Likewise, Danish destruction companies involved with creating Copenhagen’s carbuncle of hate-preaching are being named. Antifascists in Denmark have destroyed the vehicles of building companies that flattened their squats. SIOE wishes to organise boycotts against all building contractors involved with mosque construction.

    John Denham equated SIOE’s perfectly legal Harrow mosque demonstration with Moseley’s fascists. No doubt he does not believe this vandalism in Manchester to be in any way confrontational or fascistic. We can all imagine his condemnatory reaction should muslim graves be vandalised. John “Dhimmi” Denham Knight of the Order of Hypocrisy.

    The nastiest bigots are those prejudiced against their own people – and the Labour Party is full of English-hating bigots.

    English people abandon Labour because Labour has abandoned you!!

    Vote out Dhimmi Denham at the next election. Let him know what you think of this disgusting kuffarphobic Islamist vandalism.

    john@johndenham.org.uk

    NO MORE MOSQUES IN ENGLAND

    Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments »

    Clarification of anti-Islamist goups in England

    Posted by sioeengland on September 16, 2009

    against_totalitarianism

    SIOE IS SEPARATE TO THE ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE, CASUALS UNITED AND OTHER GROUPS ACROSS EUROPE

    SIOE has never had any physical opposition to its events in England until 11th September 2009, because it is universally recognised as being non-racist and opposing Nazism, Communism and the nastiest form of totalitarianism, Islam.

    SIOE has argued for a free, open an honest debate about the place, if any, of Islam within Western democracies.  However, when we have not been universally ignored by the media and politicians, we have been condemned, in the predictably hackneyed manner, with accusations of racism, bigotry etc. 

    Well, our warnings should have been listened to, because indifference and condemnation have led to the generation of other anti-Islamist groups, born out of frustration at the flagrant favouritism shown by EU governments towards Muslims and their ways of life at the expense of European values.

    Although SIOE by its very makeup is unarguably separate from the EDL and Casuals, SIOE hopes that tens of thousands of football supporters join both EDL and the Casuals.

    Dhimmi European governments, judiciaries and police forces deserve an army of young men to fearlessly confront the growth of Islam and Sharia on our continent.  They have brought it upon themselves and they certainly do deserve it.

    CHOICES

    People in England who oppose Islam now have some choices.

    1. Stop Islamisation Of Europe – SIOE

    SIOE, does not accept the notion of moderate Muslims. 

    This makes SIOE different to all other anti-Islamist groups who only oppose Islamist “extremists”. 

    SIOE seeks to stop Islam and Sharia Law, and denounces Nazism, communism, totalitarianism and racism. SIOE encourages communities persecuted by Islamic regimes, or by Muslim minorities in for example Thailand, to explain their plight because the mainstream media censor news about Islamic persecution and oppression.

    SIOE holds peaceful demonstrations across Europe at locations such as the EU Parliament and other parliamentary buildings, town squares, supermarkets and wherever it considers Islamisation is encroaching on European culture, traditions, politics and laws.

    SIOE has been campaigning since 2007.  It provides a voice for minority communities oppressed and persecuted by Muslims across the world.  It has support from such communities because of its fierce and consistent anti-racist policy and its banning of political parties from its events.

    People from all adult age groups join SIOE’s demonstrations.

    SIOE resents accusations of racism. In 2008 SIOE was the only organisation to protest against the ethnic cleansing of Greenlander Inuits by Muslims in Gellerup in northern Denmark.  It is the only organisation that demonstrates against (as opposed to talking about) the Muslim persecution of non-Muslims happening around the world.

    2. March for England and United British Association

    These groups promote English and British culture and traditions and oppose Sharia law and Islamisation. They have thrown the BNP and NF out of their demos and people of different ethnicities join their marches. They have supported the Ghurkas’ right to settle in the UK.  M4E and UBA have occasionally demonstrated about Islamisation outside of mosques since 2004.

    3. The English Defence League and Casuals United

    These are openly football supporters and demonstrate against Islamic extremists in the manner of football supporters, but deny any association with the BNP or National Front.

    They have displayed banners at demonstrations saying “to hell with the National Front”, “we are not the BNP, we are not racist we are only against Islamic extremism”.

    SIOE encourages football supporters who oppose Islamic extremism to join the English Defence League and other Defence Leagues to campaign in their unique way.  Groups already exist in Scotland and Wales and are starting up in Italy, the Netherlands and other European countries.

    4. BNP, National Front and England First Party

    If people are inclined towards the BNP, NF, EFP or any other political party who seem to do nothing other than ride on the backs of other organisations’ efforts, merely for their own publicity, or try to infiltrate groups that actually do something then please join these parties and motivate them to actively do something themselves.

    Just don’t tell those who are actually doing something their efforts are useless then spoil it for them by promoting these parties on videos of events organised by groups who have nothing to do with the BNP, NF or EFP etc.  Offering the lame excuse “it was not an official video” is one step short of pathetic.

    We won’t hold our breath.

     One thing people in England who oppose Islamisation no longer have is an excuse not to do something.

    So English people take your pick and do something.

     People from persecuted minorities who are anxious about the growth of Islam and establishment of Sharia in Europe, please support SIOE. Join SIOE or start your own action group to peacefully protest as SIOE does.

     The pressure must be continuous and must come from a broad swathe of people.

    Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments »

    11th September Harrow demo approved

    Posted by sioeengland on September 6, 2009

    skull-mosque5

      

    THE POLICE HAVE APPROVED THIS DEMONSTRATION AND WILL PROVIDE A FENCED OFF AREA FOR IT

    Please give a couple of hours for England. The date cannot be changed, September 11th is for always. Next year it will be a Saturday. Please attend this demonstration, bring a couple of friends, colleagues or acquaintances so that they can learn about Islamisation.

    If you definitely cannot attend then persuade someone you know to do so, especially if they live in London.

     

    STOP ISLAMISATION demonstration outside of Harrow central mosque on Friday 11th September at 17.00.

    BANNED FROM PROTEST

    1. As with previous SIOE demonstrations, political parties are banned.

    2. Any racist chanting, banners and placards will result in immediate ejection of the perpetrators from the demo.

    3. Totalitarian symbols such as nazi swastikas, communist hammer and sickles, Islamic star and crescent, UNLESS CLEARLY CROSSED OUT OR DEFACED WITH A STOP SIGN.

    APPROVED FOR PROTEST

    1. Approved anti-sharia and anti-Islamisation chants, banners and placards will be permitted.

    2. English, Welsh, Scottish, N. Irish, national flags, European national flags, certain other national flags will be permitted and encouraged.

    3. Certain other flags representing communities struggling against Islamic colonisation such as Papua New Guinea and Biafra will be permitted.

    4. Certain civil rights flags, banners and placards will be encouraged provided they are displayed within the no-sharia context of the demonstration.

    5. ALL MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ORGANISERS BEFORE THE PROTEST

    Speakers using hand held megaphones will address the gathering. Names of speakers will be provided to the police prior to the demonstration. Speeches must be approved by the organisers.

    Approved groups such as the English Defence League, British Citizens Against Muslim Extremists, March for England, For a Democratic and Secular Iran, will join the demonstration and the police will be notified as to which groups will attend as soon as such participation has been confirmed.

    Stewards will be provided. Banners, placards and speeches will be shown to the police prior to the protest starting if requested.

    Demonstration finishes 19.00 11th September 2009

    Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments »

     
    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 355 other followers